Blog
ObjectionsJan 29, 20269 min read

The last objection training you'll ever need, with live call examples

Every objection flushes down to time, money, or value. I'll show you the exact lines I use on live calls to get there, fast.

Short answer

How do you handle the "I need to think about it" sales objection?

I handle it by flushing it down to the real objection first. I get curious instead of offering a follow up call, ask what they feel they need to think over, then hit them with "money aside, would you do it." If they say yes and explain why, they just sold themselves using their own words.

Watch the full video: The LAST Objection Training You'll Ever Need (LIVE Examples) (2:15:03)

I've spent over $50,000 on sales training. Closed for big names. Collected $9M+ in sales along the way and got up to a 90% close rate. In this one I'm not handing you word tracks and wishing you luck. I'm showing you the live clips, the exact reframes, the exact tone, so you can run this on your next call today.

Put your phone away. This is long but it's the last objection training you'll need.

Smokescreens aren't real, and you have to flush them

First thing you need to get into your head. There's a difference between smokescreen objections, real objections, and decision-making process objections.

Smokescreen objections are the lies people tell you to protect themselves. "I need to think about it." "Can you just send me this in an email." "Let me talk to some referrals." None of that is real. There's something underneath it they're not telling you.

"Smokescreen objections are not real objections."

If you try to handle those at face value, you'll lose every time. You're answering a question nobody actually asked.

The real objections are time, money, and value. If you're doing your job right and tying down value before you even give the price, the only objection left standing should be money. Everything else, your job is to flush it down to that.

"The goal always is you need to flush it into a real objection... time, money, value."

Nine times out of ten, a think-about-it objection flushes straight to money.

Slow down before you touch the objection

The very first thing I do on any objection, especially a think-about-it, is take a sip of water.

"The very first thing I'm always going to do is I'm going to take a sip of water."

Sounds small. It's not. The prospect is sitting there in fight or flight. Fear mode. If you come back at them fast and sharp, you just confirm their fear. You slow the pace down, you give them room to come out of panic and into logic. And it buys you two seconds to actually think instead of reacting.

Use it on anything. Especially the think-about-it stall.

How I handle "I need to think about it"

Do not immediately offer a follow up call. That's the easy out. Instead, stay nonchalant and get curious.

"Okay, that's not a problem. And just so I can send over the most relevant information possible, what do you feel like you need to go over in your head just to see if I can help?"

That question does the flushing for you. Whatever they say next, that's the real objection hiding behind "I need to think about it."

Once you've got it isolated, here's the move that does the heavy lifting:

"Money aside, would you do it?"

Then immediately:

"Why would you do it? Why actually invest in yourself to get XYZ goal?"

If they say yes and start explaining why, you've just proven every other objection they threw at you wasn't the real one. And because they're the one explaining the why, they're now selling themselves. Use their exact words from earlier in the call. Discovery happened 10, 15, 20 minutes ago and the emotion from it is gone. Bring it back with their own language, not yours.

The ROI reframe, problem versus symptom

When money is the real objection, here's the sequence. Identify it, ask permission to reframe, reframe it, give a binary choice, get them to double down on why, then hit the consequence of staying the same.

The core reframe is problem versus symptom.

"Which is the problem? Which is the symptom? If you had XYZ solution, would you have that money problem?"

Say they tell you $8,000 is a lot of money. The problem isn't the $8,000. The problem is they don't have the skill to make $20,000 a month. The $8,000 feeling heavy is just a symptom of that gap.

Then the binary:

"What's riskier, finding the money so you can solve the real problem, or keep focusing on the symptom?"

Then the consequence:

"What would be the day to day ramifications if things stay the same for the next year?"

If it's purely logistical and there's no real fear or belief issue, skip all of that. Go straight to commitment.

"Money is the easy part. The hard part is just your commitment to change. Are you committed to change? Why, though?"

Negotiating from what they actually have

Once they're committed, stop guessing at payment plans. Ask what's actually available.

"Because I care about you and I want to see you win, let's not focus on what we can't do. Let's focus on what we can do. Bills, expenses aside, what do you actually have available?"

I had a guy who could put down $4,000. We worked it to $4,500 now and $3,500 in 30 days. That small shift relieved his pressure and closed the deal. You negotiate from what's real in their account right now, not from three canned payment plan options.

The partner objection, FYI or gatekeeper

"I need to talk to my partner" is one of the most common smokescreens out there, and it's almost never really about the partner.

First, clarify the conversation itself.

"What's that conversation mostly going to be about?"

Then isolate money the same way as before. Then test if it's really a permission gate or just a courtesy call.

"If your partner gave you a thumbs up, you'd just be good to go?"

And if they hesitate:

"What happens if they're not on board? Is this completely dead in the water? Would you still do it?"

This works 60 to 70% of the time before you need to go deeper into the harder partner route. I had a guy on a role play tell me he and his wife make every decision together. Dug a little and found out they'd gotten burned by a crypto scam before, that's why there was hesitation now. Once that was on the table, I asked if the investment worked in their budget and if he'd move forward regardless of a thumbs up or thumbs down. He said yes.

If it's deeper than an FYI, use responsibility.

"Whose responsibility is it for you to actually get to goal?"

"Heavy is the head that wears a crown."

And give them the actual choice they're making:

"Which conversation would you rather have? Go to them with all these problems, or show them how you've already solved the problem and lead them to that decision?"

For the "I always make decisions this way" or "I need 24 hours" crowd, scale it.

"On a scale of 1 to 10..."

"Are you happy to allow the mindset that's gotten you to a four out of ten to continue shaping your results?"

Five or below, make them explain why they're that low. Six or higher, compare their current results against their stated goal and lower the scale yourself. New Year, new me doesn't work because people postpone. Postponing is a tell. Even Friday to Monday is walking away from the goal for three days.

Fear objections and the ABCs

Fear objections don't need ten reframes. They need buy-in on one or two. Listen to the language, understand the belief behind it, customize the frame, then interrupt before they finish their sentence.

"What they choose to talk about is what they're choosing to think about. So if I control what they talk about, I control what they think about... I'm going to cut them off before they get to their 'but.'"

I use the ABCs. Admit the fear, befriend the fear, convert the fear.

Admit it softly:

"Taking that leap... I don't want to use the word scary, but it's kind of scary in a way, right?"

Befriend it:

"What you're feeling right now is exactly what you're supposed to feel, 'cause who grows in your comfort zone? If you're cool as a cucumber, I have to check your pulse."

That line gets a laugh and gets agreement at the same time. You're not eliminating the fear, you're making it normal. They still have to live with it, just reframed as proof they're growing.

Then convert it into a binary.

"We have two options. Number one, we allow it to constrict us and we don't get to goal. Or number two, we shape it into taking massive action because we put some skin in the game. Now it has to work. Which one would you rather do?"

Customize the goal, ask "Why though?" and let them talk themselves into the empowering choice. Then close again right after.

On a real $45,000 call, the guy had the money sitting there. I used the same frame.

"Fear can either be two things... constrict us... or we can use it... put some skin in the game. Now this has to work... Would you be open to using that energy to getting you to 20K as quick as possible?"

He agreed the investment was small compared to where he wanted to go, and I asked him straight up if he'd bet on himself, and how he'd ever sell anyone else through fear if he couldn't get past his own. He moved forward.

The two voices in your head

For bigger decisions, I use a disassociation frame. Two voices.

"I always have two voices in my head. One is telling me to jump in, the other one is telling me to wait... The bitch voice says, 'I can't do it. I need to wait.' The boss voice says, 'You need to take action. You need to bet on yourself.'"

Separating the prospect from the fear like this works because now it's not them, it's a voice. Whichever one they feed gets louder. I had a guy pulling in over $500K wanting to hit $1M+. Asked him which voice he wanted to make louder. He bought.

Quantify the cost of sitting on the fence

If someone's dragging their feet, do the math out loud. I had a rep losing one or two think-about-it prospects a week, and only 25% ever came back.

"If it's one to two per week... we're losing out on like $16,000 in commissions... So how are we going to be able to overcome those 'think about it' objections if we can't overcome that own objection in our own head?"

Delay has a price tag. Put a number on it and the "safe" choice suddenly looks like the riskiest one.

Referrals, competitors, and clarity stalls

For the "let me talk to some referrals" line:

"What are you hoping to get out of that conversation that maybe we didn't cover here?"

Then:

"Are you looking for reasons to do this or reasons not to do this?"

For "I need more clarity" stalls:

"You never know what the weather is actually going to be at the beach tomorrow until you get there... the only way you're going to know is if you do it."

And for the "let me compare a few competitors" stall, challenge the criteria.

"Does it really help me to talk to five different plumbers if they're all going to say they can fix it?"

All three of these exist to expose what's actually going on. Price, value, certainty, or just a habitual way they've always made decisions. Your job isn't to argue the surface line. It's to find what's underneath it and handle that.

The bottom line

Every objection you'll ever hear flushes down to time, money, or value. Smokescreens are never the real issue, they're just the mask. Slow the call down, isolate the real objection with "money aside, would you do it," reframe problem against symptom, and always get them to say why in their own words. Fear doesn't need to disappear, it needs to get converted into fuel. Learn this roadmap and you stop fighting objections and start seeing them for what they are. A prospect looking for a reason to say yes to themselves.

Christian Polk

Written by Christian Polk

Christian Polk is a high ticket closer, sales trainer and the founder of Precision Closer, based in Scottsdale, Arizona.

More about me

Stuck at $10k to $25k a month?Let's fix that.

Precision Closer is my coaching program for high ticket closers. 1 on 1s with me, 4 group calls a week, and the full system.

See if you're a fit